Semaglutide 2.4 mg 'Ushers in a New Era in Medical Obesity Care'

October 2, 2023

The recently licensed weight-loss drug semaglutide 2.4 mg/week (Wegovy, Novo Nordisk) "is likely to usher in a new era in the medical treatment of obesity," stated Lee M. Kaplan, MD, PhD, at the virtual American Diabetes Association (ADA) 81st Scientific Sessions.

Kaplan discussed the clinical implications of caring for patients with obesity now that the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist is approved in the United States for weight loss.

Weight loss with semaglutide 2.4 mg was twice that achieved with liraglutide 3 mg (Saxenda, Novo Nordisk) — that is, roughly a 10% to 15% weight loss at 68 weeks, said Kaplan, who was not involved in the pivotal STEP clinical trials of the agent. 

"I think as we start to see more data come in over the next couple of years," including from the cardiovascular outcome trial SELECT, he continued, "we'll be able to use the data to create a nuanced [individualized patient treatment] approach, but we'll also be able to use our clinical experience, which will grow rapidly over the next few years."

In future, semaglutide is likely to be combined with other drugs to provide even greater weight loss, predicts Kaplan, director of the Obesity, Metabolism, and Nutrition Institute at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

In the meantime, "to be effective, semaglutide needs to be used," he stressed, while noting that responses to the drug vary by individual, and so this will need to be taken into account.

"Obesity needs to be recognized as a disease in its own right, as well as a risk factor for numerous other diseases, [and] equitable access to obesity treatment needs to be broadened," he emphasized.


Four Pivotal Phase 3 trials

As previously reported, four pivotal 68-week, phase 3 clinical trials in the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People With Obesity (STEP) program tested the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg/week in more than 4500 adults with overweight or obesity.

The trials have been published in high profile journals — the New England Journal of Medicine (STEP 1), The Lancet (STEP 2), and JAMA (STEP 3STEP 4) — said Robert F. Kushner, MD.

"I would encourage all of you to download and read each of these trials on your own," said Kushner, professor of medicine and medicine education at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in Chicago, Illinois, and coauthor of STEP 1, before presenting a top-level review of key results.

STEP 1 examined weight management, STEP 3 added a background of intensive behavioral therapy, STEP 4 investigated sustained weight management, and STEP 2 (unlike the others) investigated weight management in patients with type 2 diabetes, he summarized.

In STEP 1, patients who received semaglutide had an average 15% weight loss, and those who stayed on the drug had a 17% weight loss, compared with the 2.4% weight loss in the placebo group.

"One third of individuals in the trial achieved at least a 20% weight loss or more," Kushner said, which is "really phenomenal."


The results of STEP 3 "suggest that semaglutide with monthly brief lifestyle counseling alone is sufficient to produce a mean weight loss of 15%," he noted, as adding a low-calorie diet and intensive behavior therapy sped up the initial weight loss but did not increase the final weight loss.

A post-hoc analysis of STEP 2 showed "it's clear that improvement in A1c" is greater with at least a 10% weight loss versus a smaller weight loss, Kushner said. A1c dropped by 2.2% versus 1.3%, with these two weight losses respectively.

In STEP 4, after dose escalation to 2.4 mg at 20 weeks, patients had lost 10.6% of their initial weight. At 68 weeks, those who were switched to placebo at 20 weeks had lost 5.4% of their initial weight, whereas those who remained on semaglutide had lost 17.7% of their initial weight.


This shows that "if you remove the drug, the disease starts to come back," Kushner pointed out.

Nausea, the most common side effect, occurred in 20% of patients, but was mostly mild or moderate, and gastrointestinal effects including constipation, vomiting, and diarrhea were transient and occurred early in the dose escalation phase.

Large Individual Variability, Combination Therapies on Horizon

Kaplan pointed out, however, that "like [with] other anti-obesity therapies...there's a large patient-to-patient variability."

A third of patients exhibit more than 20% weight loss, and 10% exhibit more than 30% weight loss — approaching the efficacy of b

ariatric surgery.

However, nearly 10% of patients without diabetes and upwards of 30% of patients with diabetes will experience less than 5% weight loss, he said.

Therefore, "success or failure in one patient doesn't predict response in another, and we should always remember that as we treat different patients with these medications," Kaplan advised clinicians.

A recent phase 1b study suggests that combination therapy with semaglutide and the amylin agonist cagrilintide ups weight loss, as previously reported.

In this short trial with no lifestyle modification, it took 16 weeks for patients to reach full dosing, and at 20 weeks, patients on semaglutide had lost 8% of their initial weight, whereas those on combination therapy had lost 17% of their initial weight.

"There's hope that, in combination with cagrilintide and probably with several other agents that are still in early development, we'll be seeing average weight loss that is in the range of that seen with bariatric surgery," Kushner said.


Case 1


ou have a patient with type 2 diabetes, a body mass index (BMI) of 32, 33 kg/m2, and an A1c of 7.5% or 8% on metformin. Would you use semaglutide 1 mg (Ozempic, Novo Nordisk) that is indicated for type 2 diabetes, or would you use semaglutide 2.4 mg that is indicated for obesity and risk factors?

"We have the answer to that from STEP 2," said Melanie J. Davies, MB ChB, MD, professor of diabetes medicine at the University of Leicester, UK, who led the STEP 2 trial.

"For some patients, the 1-mg dose, which we use routinely in the clinic, may be reasonable to get good glycemic control for cardiovascular protection and will obviously achieve some weight loss. But if you really want to go for the weight-related comorbidities, then the 2.4-mg dose is what you need," she said.

Dr Melanie J. Davies

"A lot of [clinicians] might say: 'I'll see how [the patient goes] with the 1-mg dose, and then maybe if they're not losing the weight and not getting to glycemic target, then maybe I'll switch to 2.4 mg,'" said John Wilding, MD, who leads clinical research into obesity, diabetes, and endocrinology at the University of Liverpool, in the UK, and led the STEP 1 trial.

"But the STEP 2 data show very clearly that you get almost the same A1c," Rosenstock interjected. "I would go for 2.4 mg. The patient has a BMI of 32, 33 kg/m2. I would hit hard the BMI. We need to change that paradigm."

"For other diseases we don't always go to the maximum dose that's available. We go to the dose that's necessary to achieve the clinical endpoint that we want," Kaplan noted. "I think one of the challenges is going to be to learn how to clinically nuance our therapy the way we do for other diseases."

"That is the usual thinking," Rosenstock agreed. But "with the 2.4-mg dose, one third get a 20% reduction of BMI, and 10% get almost a 30% reduction — and you [aren't] going to see that with semaglutide 1 mg!"



"That's true," Kaplan conceded. However, a patient with a relatively low BMI of 32, 33 kg/m2 may not need the higher dose, unlike a patient who has a BMI of 45 kg/m2 and diabetes. But we're going to find that out over the next couple of years, he expects.

Case 2

Dr John Wilding

You have a patient with a BMI of 31 kg/m2 who is newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Why should you start them with metformin? Why won't you start them with something that will directly tackle obesity and get the patient to lose 20 pounds and for sure the blood sugar is going to be better?

"I think if I have someone who is really keen to put their diabetes into remission," Wilding said, "this would be a fantastic approach because they would have a really high chance of doing that."

The prediabetes data from STEP showed that "we can put a lot of people from prediabetes back to normal glucose tolerance," Wilding noted. "Maybe we can put people with early diabetes back to normal as well. I think that's a trial that really does need to be done," he said.


"I think you have to remember that of the millions and millions of people with obesity, a very small portion are currently treated with anti-obesity medication, and an even smaller portion are getting bariatric surgery," Kaplan replied.

"In the United States, 90% of people who get bariatric surgery are self-referred," he said, so, "I think initially we are not going to see much of a change" in rates of bariatric surgery.


1234 

Next


Transform with the Y LIFT®: Youthful Results in 30 Minutes
By Gina Mantor February 21, 2025
Unlock a more youthful version of yourself with the Y LIFT®, an advanced cosmetic procedure designed to redefine facial contours into the perfect 'Y' shape. By focusing on the cheekbones and jawline, this technique offers a lifted appearance without traditional surgery. The Y LIFT® employs a blunt titanium tool and FDA-approved fillers to sculpt and support facial muscles, delivering results that last up to four years. This innovative method avoids incisions and ensures minimal dyiscomfort, making it ideal for those seeking a non-surgical facelift. Now is the time to achieve the youthful, vibrant look you've always wanted. Schedule your complimentary consultation to learn how the Y LIFT® can enhance your natural beauty with precision and care.
Enhance your beauty with expert PDO thread lifts by MD Injector Dr. Gina Mantor. Free consultations
November 24, 2024
PDO thread lifts for a rejuvenated appearance. Trusted MD injector Dr. Gina Mantor offers free consultations.
November 22: Celebrate & Save at Our Holiday Sale-a-Bration!
November 12, 2024
Secure Your Spot for Exciting Prizes & Free Gifts—RSVP Today!
Refresh and Rejuvenate with Dermaplaning. Read more on the procedure here.
October 29, 2024
Say goodbye to dull skin and hello to radiance with our professional dermaplane treatment. Start glowing!
Now, with FDA clearance for treatment of the neck, BOTOX® offers a new way to address neck wrinkles
October 24, 2024
When it comes to tackling the signs of aging, Botox has long been a go-to solution for smoothing out facial lines. Now, with FDA clearance for treatment of the neck, Botox offers a new way to address those pesky neck wrinkles that can add years to your appearance. If you're seeking an effective, non-surgical way to rejuvenate your neck, read on to discover how Botox can help you achieve a more youthful look.
Discover key differences between Emsculpt and Dysport on Dr. Mantor's Wrinkle and Weight Solutions blog.
October 21, 2024
In the ever-evolving world of aesthetics, maintaining a youthful appearance has become more accessible thanks to injectables like Botox and Dysport. Whether you’re starting to see those fine lines in the mirror or noticing frown lines in photographs, understanding your options can empower you to make the best choice for your skincare routine. Let’s dive into the differences between Botox and Dysport to help you decide which one might be right for you. Understanding the Basics of Botox and Dysport Botox and Dysport are both derived from botulinum toxin, a naturally occurring neurotoxic protein. When used in controlled, small amounts, this protein can temporarily paralyze facial muscles, effectively smoothing out wrinkles and fine lines. These injectables have garnered widespread popularity in the cosmetic industry for their ability to deliver youthful, rejuvenated skin. However, they are also utilized in treating various medical conditions such as chronic migraines, excessive sweating, and muscle spasms. Despite their common origin, Botox and Dysport are not identical. One of the key differences lies in their molecular structure, which influences their spread and efficacy. Dysport’s smaller molecules allow it to diffuse more easily, potentially covering a larger area with fewer injections. This characteristic can be particularly advantageous for treating broader areas like the forehead. Botox, with its slightly larger molecular size, is often preferred for more targeted treatments, such as small, localized wrinkles. Another critical aspect to consider is the onset of action. Some individuals may notice Dysport's effects sooner than Botox, making it a preferable option for those seeking quick results. However, both treatments reach their peak effectiveness at about two weeks post-injection. Understanding these fundamental differences between Botox and Dysport can help you make a more informed decision about which injectable might be best suited to your specific needs and aesthetic goals. The Science Behind Botox and Dysport Both Botox and Dysport work by disrupting the communication between nerves and muscles through the action of botulinum toxin type A. This neurotoxin inhibits the release of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter responsible for triggering muscle contractions. By blocking this signal, the muscles relax, leading to a smoother appearance of the skin above. Despite sharing this fundamental mechanism, Botox and Dysport are formulated with distinct trace proteins, which can impact how they diffuse through the tissue. Dysport has smaller molecules, allowing it to spread more easily over larger areas. This characteristic can be beneficial for treating extensive regions, such as the forehead. Conversely, Botox's slightly larger molecules make it better suited for more localized applications. The unique compositions of these injectables also affect the onset of their effects. Dysport tends to show results more quickly, often within 2-3 days, while Botox usually takes about a week for noticeable changes. Additionally, the duration of the effects from both injectables is typically similar, lasting around 3-4 months. Understanding these molecular differences helps explain why certain treatments may be more effective for specific types of wrinkles or facial areas. Whether you choose Botox or Dysport, the science behind these products ensures that both offer effective solutions for minimizing the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles. Areas of Effectiveness for Botox and Dysport When it comes to addressing specific facial concerns, Botox and Dysport each have their unique strengths. Botox is celebrated for its versatility, effectively treating a range of wrinkles such as crow’s feet, forehead lines, and laugh lines. This makes it a go-to option for those looking to address multiple areas of the face in a single session. Dysport, on the other hand, has carved out its niche primarily for glabellar lines—the vertical frown lines between the eyebrows. This makes it particularly effective for individuals who have moderate to severe frown lines that can create a perpetually tired or angry appearance. Its ability to spread more easily over larger areas can also make it a favorable option for broader regions of the face, even though its official approval is more targeted. It's essential to consult with a skilled practitioner who can tailor the treatment to your specific needs. Your unique facial anatomy, muscle strength, and aesthetic goals will influence whether Botox or Dysport is the more suitable option for you. Both injectables offer robust solutions, but their areas of effectiveness can vary, making personalized consultation invaluable. Onset of Results: How Quickly Do They Work? When considering the speed of results for Botox and Dysport, it’s important to recognize the subtle differences in how each injectable performs. Many people turn to Dysport for its rapid onset, with noticeable improvements often appearing within just 2-3 days post-treatment. This can be particularly appealing for those seeking swift changes before an important event or occasion. On the other hand, Botox typically takes a bit longer to show its effects, with most users observing changes around the one-week mark. Despite this slight delay, both injectables generally achieve their full results at approximately two weeks after injection. This timeline ensures that, regardless of your choice, you can expect a refreshed and rejuvenated appearance within a similar period. The quick onset of Dysport can be attributed to its molecular structure, which allows for faster diffusion through the treated area. This makes it a preferred option for those who are looking for immediate improvements. However, the initial wait for Botox's results should not be seen as a disadvantage, as its proven efficacy remains a strong draw for many. Ultimately, the decision between Botox and Dysport may come down to your personal preference for how quickly you wish to see changes. Whether you’re looking for the fast-acting effects of Dysport or are comfortable with the slightly longer onset of Botox, both options provide reliable solutions for achieving smoother, younger-looking skin. Duration of Effects: How Long Do They Last? The longevity of results is a key factor when considering Botox and Dysport for your aesthetic treatments. Typically, the effects of both injectables last between 3 to 4 months, though individual results can vary based on factors such as metabolism, muscle activity, and the specific areas treated. Some individuals may find that their results from Dysport appear quicker but fade slightly sooner, whereas Botox might take a bit longer to show but maintain its effects for the full duration. Regular maintenance treatments are essential for sustaining the desired appearance. This allows for the consistent management of fine lines and wrinkles, ensuring that the youthful look achieved through these injectables is preserved over time. It's also worth noting that the longevity of effects can improve with repeated treatments, as the muscles may become more accustomed to relaxing. Understanding the duration of these treatments helps in planning your appointments effectively. Whether you opt for Botox or Dysport, knowing how long you can expect the results to last will enable you to schedule follow-up sessions accordingly, maintaining a smooth, youthful appearance with minimal interruption to your routine. Dosage and Potency Differences Between Botox and Dysport When it comes to the dosage and potency of Botox versus Dysport, one of the key distinctions lies in their unit measurements. Botox is approximately three times as potent as Dysport on a per-unit basis. This difference doesn’t mean that Botox is inherently more effective, but it does influence the way these treatments are administered. With Botox's higher potency, fewer units are generally needed to achieve the desired effect. In contrast, more units of Dysport may be required to deliver similar results. This unit variance means that practitioners need to adjust their techniques based on the specific injectable being used. However, the cost per unit of Dysport is typically lower than that of Botox. Despite requiring more units, the overall cost for treatments with either injectable tends to balance out. This means that financial considerations between the two are often comparable, allowing patients to make their choice based on other factors like onset of results, specific treatment areas, and personal preferences. Understanding the differences in dosage and potency is crucial for setting realistic expectations. The way Botox and Dysport are formulated impacts not only the amount used but also how they interact with your facial muscles. Experienced injectors will know how to tailor the dosage to suit your unique facial anatomy and aesthetic goals, ensuring that you achieve a natural, rejuvenated look. Your specific needs, such as the area of treatment and the severity of wrinkles, will also play a role in determining the appropriate dosage. Consulting with a qualified practitioner is essential to navigate these nuances effectively, optimizing your treatment experience with either Botox or Dysport. Cost Comparison: What to Expect When considering the cost of Botox versus Dysport, it’s important to understand that while a single unit of Dysport is generally less expensive than a unit of Botox, more Dysport units are typically needed to achieve the same effect. This dosage discrepancy often balances out the overall treatment cost, making the financial outlay for both options quite similar. The number of units required for effective treatment can vary based on the specific area being targeted and the severity of the wrinkles. For instance, treating crow’s feet or forehead lines may require different quantities of each product to achieve the desired results. This variability emphasizes the need for a personalized approach when planning your treatment. In addition to the per-unit cost, other factors like the injector’s expertise, geographic location, and clinic reputation can also influence the overall expense. Choosing a skilled practitioner is essential for maximizing the value of your investment, as their experience can significantly impact the quality of your results. Moreover, some clinics offer package deals or loyalty programs, which can make regular maintenance treatments more affordable. Discuss these options during your consultation to fully understand the cost structure and any potential savings. Ultimately, the best approach to cost comparison is to focus on the value provided by achieving your desired aesthetic outcome, rather than the price per unit alone. Individual Variability: Personal Responses to Treatments Individual variability plays a significant role in how Botox and Dysport perform. Each person’s skin type, muscle structure, and metabolic rate can influence the effectiveness and duration of these injectables. Some individuals may find that Dysport works faster for them, providing noticeable improvements in just a few days, while others might prefer the steady onset of Botox. Additionally, factors like lifestyle habits, skincare routines, and even diet can impact how well these treatments hold up over time. If you've previously used Botox and are curious about Dysport, it's worth noting that trying a different product can sometimes yield better or quicker results. Your body's unique response to the different formulations could mean that one is more suitable for your aesthetic goals than the other. Because of this inherent variability, it's crucial to have a detailed consultation with a skilled practitioner who can assess your individual needs and recommend the most effective treatment plan. Consultation: Choosing the Right Injectable for You Choosing between Botox and Dysport is a decision best made with the guidance of a qualified md injector. To help navigate which toxin best serves your needs, Dr. Gina Mantor, a Double-board certified Physician and Master Injector, provides complimentary consultations and personalized treatment plans. A thorough consultation can help tailor the treatment to your unique facial anatomy, aesthetic goals, and lifestyle considerations. During your consultation, Dr. Mantor will assess your skin, discuss your medical history, and understand your previous experiences with injectables if any. A critical part of this consultation is setting realistic expectations. Both Botox and Dysport have their distinct advantages, but their effectiveness can vary based on individual factors such as muscle strength, skin type, and metabolic rate. By understanding your specific needs, Dr. Mantor can recommend the most appropriate option for you! The consultation also provides an opportunity to address any questions or concerns you may have about the procedure, recovery time, and potential side effects. This transparency ensures that you are well-informed and comfortable with your decision. Additionally, we will cover cost implications, helping you understand the overall investment required for maintaining your desired look. Personalized treatment plans are essential for achieving optimal results. Whether you’re looking to smooth out frown lines, crow’s feet, or forehead wrinkles, the expertise of a professional injector can make a significant difference in the outcome. By taking the time to evaluate your individual circumstances, the injector can create a customized approach that enhances your natural beauty while aligning with your aesthetic goals. Ready to explore your options? Schedule your consultation to start your journey towards a more youthful, refreshed appearance. Call 614.891.2000 or schedule with us 24/7 online! Since 2008 Dr. Mantor’s Wrinkle and Weight Solutions, LLC 6982 Worthington Road Westerville, OH 43082
Breast Cancer Awareness month, what you need to know
October 2, 2024
Breast Cancer: Recognizing the Signs and Symptoms Understanding the usual appearance and feel of your breasts is an essential aspect of maintaining breast health
Trusted nutritional recommendations for prescription weight loss, helping patients achieve their goals since 2008.
October 2, 2024
Intro Navigating the landscape of prescription weight loss can often feel overwhelming, especially when it comes to understanding the nutritional guidelines associated with anti-obesity medications like Wegovy, Ozempic, or Mounjaro. While these medications offer promising results, such as a significant reduction in body weight and improved blood glucose control, it's crucial to align these benefits with a diet that's nutritionally dense. A well-rounded approach to nutrition can support healthy weight loss, mitigate potential adverse effects, and enhance overall well-being.
LasedMD Laser resurfacing for fine lines, wrinkles and age spots.
October 1, 2024
Welcome to a new era of skin rejuvenation, where achieving better skin is not just a dream but a reality within your grasp. With LaseMD Ultra, the ultimate weapon in the battle against fine lines and wrinkles, you're empowered to unleash your skin's true potential. This cutting-edge laser technology by Lutronic promises not only to restore but to revolutionize your skin's natural glow. It's time to embrace a future where your skin reflects the vibrant, youthful spirit within you. Let's dive into this transformative journey!
Overcome ED with the Magnym™ Procedure, designed to rejuvenate confidence and transform relationship
September 26, 2024
In the realm of men's health, erectile dysfunction (ED) emerges as a prevalent issue, impacting not just physical performance but also mental well-being and emotional stability. For many, it stands as a silent barrier to intimacy, overshadowing confidence and self-esteem. Fortunately, innovative solutions like the Magnym™ Procedure offer hope and empowerment. This treatment is designed to address the root causes of ED, transforming challenges into triumphs and revitalizing your confidence in every aspect of life.
More Posts
Share by: